The rule is, but the rule always prevents rule-breaking. Or more likely, the rule is ever so lucid. So lucid, that lucidity, in the wake of the rule at least, can never exist. And the holder of the rule as his own does not share or care for such questioning of his rule, that he has himself taken to be so. The bringing into question of the rule that appears innate, in that it is natural and in that it is definately unnatural not to play or be played by the rule. Understanding of the rule is omnipotent; for even the rule-breaker hides behind a wall built from the rule.
Wednesday, 10 September 2008
Cuscus
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment