#

Gripped by the drama without a doubt. There was no better time to take a considered look at the impact on us all. Today the empire became written and presented, featuring the traces up to the present day, from slavery and the influences of the emminent thinkers. An author and academic, a historian of the people who specialised briefly became one big influence today. It will not suprise you summing up two different interests in tandem, the paradox to choose, to go along with the creed of freedom, betrayed in certain circumstances by the guiding star. Infused to self invent, invoke improvisation and the spirit. From the beginning the fact that major power, probably the puritans knew rigid good and evil. They saw a few of themselves as the exemplary nation with the attitude towards landscape. Great events running through were a kind of drive towards the accumulation of wealth and power and the national state. To achieve this fact the the use of wealth and power was in few hands and the goal of the guiding star of liberty became crippled by the economic deprivation theme. National power worked to expand chance for the few in all stages, and tensions. They did not see danger in vastness.There were first and third real dangers, literally not be found. Over a brief time the rough edges were explained to some extent by choosing the central theme, the paradox already a land of liberty and institution. In a way vastness is a story of land taken and driven by imperial texture. History, right from the very beginning. The work and literature within called to arms such and others like him - The Leader of a group in the great result of repression -conceptualised in an effort to build a city as an island. Here. In order to do so, legitamate massacre torched, one number in one sweet sacrafice. More empire than liberty and the idea of talking about it. Talk was of the beacon for the world. From the beginning it started with taking land and expansion and war with every expansion overseas. Accompanied by liberty, of course increasing the history and the fact fitting the early notion into the general profound event. wrestling with the all time articulators to find a scheme to truly understand the document that express it more clearly than had ever been written. Violated by knowledge and knowing does not make the need to struggle, to expand across the line that has never been done. In particular, the century was the inconcievable paradox. significant in part for the acquisition of land and smaller numbers. "What do you say?" Nothing can be done to wipe it clean nothing detracts from the ideal of the nation and the short sighted. Obviously, schism is culture absolutely and the right were terrible never to be innocent. Centuries now unfold of struggle with expansion that faces into the identity politics of the cutting edge. We stand naked, in confrontation with part of man that always wants to portray experiment. To be down on vices and banning experimentation before the pressures becomes too strong. For much of the south, because land became a comment, they aspired to work the land. Attractive but failed experiments, speak of blessings but not necessarily essentially but inefficiently of the curious economic bottom line. Segregation, on the other hand even in the sense of the irrational became above and apart and is felt today absolutely. Reality responds and struggles against the century of movement, and yet. And yet what makes it less than absolutely criminalised. The enormous population, are a long way from the political structure and a sense of free to protest is one of the things we overlook when we take fate into our own hands. These same levels won the movements around the world. Guilt and responsibility, a reluctance to persue, all of which are open to us, and our own reluctance. Wildly idealistic huge problems fix with the world of extraordinarily remarkable moves on concentration and anything and the important one. The wellspring of genius, brings together harmoniously historically. They had a broader originality taken in war and a broader might because of the need for people with different pens and tolerance and welcome. Settling suburbs and roots drawing in vast terrain and opposition later became intellectualised the idea open in a sense of industrial system which developed homogeneity. Industrial mines mind and so on - they came to work and it was not welcoming but exploitation. Objects of ridicule, enormous amounts of hostility accounts for welcoming and treatment as equals is what is happening. The rage! the innocent rounding up and threatening. Useful, desperate teams in glowing terms. Born abroad perhaps more than that, analysis here for many cases treated well and expoited openly assimilated, wonderful assimiliator of fabric as fabric and easily grouped and something of them in a discussion enduring revolution around 'however bad it is it was better in the old world' - see how it was made better... For example, within a few years the making it or the seeing of the making of it gave not a hard time, harder times people, service easily and excusily face today, facing harassment running through. Things are bad but in the end we are really ok, becomes an excuse for complacency and economic system which believes leaving poverty behind is a good idea. Well, yes, but we've solved them. These Huge problems, and it ought to be better, we hold a belief in the redemptive power of politics and culture. The belief loosely is something else. the power through to the revival creates sects and invents one own, marching together, hearts of the new central buried century, late away to surprise under the surface. In a second in a moment and those early, first crowds, the shapes and the experience. They did discourse on the axis of state, evil totally rooted directly became a socially modern error, think of the differences culturally, driven by belief. Overplaying is a part of what we use for it. Much to do with the opening up in a wider way than before. Our kind elsewhere talking about pro-life and the meaning of anything. Responding to a liberalism that tampers with the order. A response to a political reaction. Society is a response in movement and order. Our Sceptical eyebrows, cause and compete the looking around the sea of empire and liberty, some population putting its feet over the world. The empire that has military invades aptly so gives itself a rational. Tells this as a falsely moral rationale of expansion. A rationale to justify a task. Back to the recent couple of things and the impact and so on. Creating a reaction commented on the south and heartland moving to other parts into political activity, energising those forces. Constitution and the extent to the modern with a lack of embarassment or shame, prettiily and cleverly back to the theme faced with what they called a more perfect sense of individual locus of power - about balance for necessity, a bundle of work as a kind of guessing genius unresolved always deciding which power applies today, specifically. Pussing into the arena opened up or not, overridden. No resolution between which power prevails, legitamate mantaining the wealthy elite, bundle of framed worries and rebellions of the powerless stimulate wealthy government to make sure that insurrection and rebellion restablishes the elite and grows directly. Deligitamised after the paradox that we have been talking about for these many minutes progressively yet at the same time suggesting a compromise for human nature. Over time, the perfect struggle to face things and all of this ends well. The Highest standard of living is exported and report on health and rank behind giving the fact of wealth shamefully disproportionate. To give wealth and create wealth. Turning finally in a sense across the table to evoke strong reactions of past and future importance and the out of time.